logo

Get the best of Commons Magazine — FREE!

COMMONS MAGAZINE

“Better, Not More” Is Rallying Cry for a New Economy

Filmmaker Annie Leonard outlines the necessity and challenges for the movement

(By Lindsay France, courtesy of Cornell University) 

Environmental activist and filmmaker Annie Leonard has a knack for looking at familiar things in a new light that opens possibilities for transformation. 

Her short film The Story of Stuff offered an “a-ha” moment for many of its 12 million viewers by revealing the ecological pricetag of a hyper-consuming society where accumulation of possessions has become the chief measure of success.  Leonard’s genius is to steer away from a preachy, blaming tone and concentrate instead on the underlying economic structures that fuel wanton consumerism and highlight practical solutions to the crisis.

In subsequent online films she brings similar common-sense illumination to subjects as varied as bottled water, the Citizens United court ruling that threatens to drown US politics in fat-cat money and the myth that the USA is too broke to afford public services and environmental regulations.  Last year, Leonard became the executive director of Greenpeace USA.

This body of work made her the perfect choice to kick off the rousing Just Giving conference exploring the idea of “Better, Not More…Principles and Practices for the Next Economy” sponsored by the Edge Funders Alliance in Baltimore early this month. 

In her opening remarks, she raised five key points about the role of “more” in modern society that influences all discussion of the subject.

--- More is not physically possible at a time when “we use 1 ½ planet’s resources every year”.

---More is central to capitalist economics, which makes “challenging more a big deal”.

---More is tied to the American Dream.  “The US is an aspirational society…So we need to ask, ‘More of what?’ ”

---More is an obstacle to justice. “Some people do need more,” therefore any challenge to the “more” paradigm must include ways to better share resources.

---More is sometimes better. But we’ve confused specific cases, such as more food for famine victims, with our overall goals.  In truth, “This obsession with more is undermining better.”

Leonard’s observations served as backdrop for the event, which brought together people working on economic and green issues from both foundations and activist organizations.  “This is an invitation to reconsider together our analysis, our strategies and our options,” explained On the Commons co-founder Director Harriet Barlow, co-chair of the conference. “We can be unafraid to be as radical as we need to be to make systems change that is needed.”

One shining example of  “better, not more” discussed at Just Giving was the rise of  social economy initiatives in Quebec over the past two decades. Today more than 7000 cooperatives and non-profit businesses provide 125,000 jobs and account for 8 percent of the province’s GDP, according to Nancy Neamtam, co-founder of Chantier de L’Economie Sociale. Eight networks of collective enterprises (which she notes have a lower loss rate for investments than conventional businesses) operate a $32 million (Canadian) fund for housing, and $53 million fund for other projects.

A tragic example of “better” losing out to “more” (for the planet’s wealthiest people) was seen in the recent Ebola health crisis, noted Opal Tometi, co-founder of Black Lives Matter and director of the Black Alliance for Just Immigration.  The disease erupted in West African nations where public health programs had been cut back in the wave of global austerity measures, she explained. “It will take a multi-racial international movement to make sure that black lives matter-- not only in the US but around the world.”

Adapted from the website of Blue Mountain Center, a working community of writers, artists and activists in upstate New York.